टीवीएस अपाचे आरटीआर 160 vs केटीएम 200 ड्यूक तुलना

    Compare टीवीएस अपाचे आरटीआर 160 vs केटीएम 200 ड्यूक to know which is better. Detailed bikes comparison on टीवीएस अपाचे आरटीआर 160 vs केटीएम 200 ड्यूक; compare on-road price, performance and other features on bike comparison site.
  • टीवीएस अपाचे आरटीआर 160 RM Drum (Black Edition) vs केटीएम 200 ड्यूक 2023 STD – Which model is Cheapest?

    The ex-showroom price of the केटीएम 200 ड्यूक in New Delhi starts at ₹ 1.91 लाख. On the other hand, टीवीएस अपाचे आरटीआर 160 price in New Delhi of base variant starts at ₹ 1.11 लाख and goes up to Rs. ₹ 1.23 लाख for range topping model

    Summaryटीवीएस अपाचे आरटीआर 160 RM Drum (Black Edition)केटीएम 200 ड्यूक 2023 STD
    Price₹ 1.11 लाख₹ 1.91 लाख
    ManufacturerTVSKTM
    Body TypeCommuterSports
    Mileage47.00 KM/L35.00 KM/L
    Power16.04 PS @ 8750 rpm bhp25.00 bhp
    Engine159.7 CC199.5 CC
    Fuel TypePetrolPetrol

  • टीवीएस अपाचे आरटीआर 160 RM Drum (Black Edition) vs केटीएम 200 ड्यूक 2023 STD – Which gives Better Mileage?

    As for the claimed fuel efficiency, the केटीएम 200 ड्यूक base engine returns 35 KM/L. The टीवीएस अपाचे आरटीआर 160 base returns 47 KM/L

  • टीवीएस अपाचे आरटीआर 160 RM Drum (Black Edition) vs केटीएम 200 ड्यूक 2023 STD – Which has a Better Engine Efficiency?

    In the powertrain department, the केटीएम 200 ड्यूक gets bhp Petrol engine, whereas the टीवीएस अपाचे आरटीआर 160 comes in bhp Petrol engine

107 1138
114 1100
bike-icon

ईएमआई

@ 11.5% 36 महीनों के लिए

3,298/M
5,672/M

विशेषज्ञ रेटिंग

7.9
8.1
design
performance
fuel consumption
significance
safety
comfort
value for money
7.5 
7.0 
8.0 
9.0 
7.0 
8.0 
8.5 
8.0 
8.0 
6.5 
9.0 
8.0 
9.0 
8.3 

User Review

3.9
rating yellowrating yellowrating yellowrating yellowrating grey
4863 Ratings
15 Reviews
4
rating yellowrating yellowrating yellowrating yellowrating grey
2338 Ratings
22 Reviews

Engine & Performance

Engine CC
Max Torque
Top Speed
No. of Gears
159.7 सीसी
199.5 सीसी
13.85 Nm @ 7000 Rpm
19.30
107 kmph
142 kmph
5 गियर्स
6 गियर्स

Dimension and Weight

Ground Clearance
Kerb Weight
Seat Height
180 mm मिलीमीटर
155 mm मिलीमीटर
137,138 किलोग्राम
159 किलोग्राम
790 मिलीमीटर
823 मिलीमीटर

Fuel Efficiency

Fuel tank Capacity
Mileage
12.0 L
13.4 L
47 किमी/लीटर
35 किमी/लीटर

Suspension Brakes & Wheels

Front Brake Type
Rear Brake Type
Front Tyre
Rear Tyre
Wheel Type
Disc
Disc
Disc,Drum
Disc
90/90-17 49P Tubeless
110/70 X 17
110/80-17 57P Tubeless
150/60 X 17
Alloy Wheels
Alloy Wheels

Standard Features

Instrument Console
Odometer
Speedometer
Fuel Gauge
Start Mechanism
Hazard Warning Indicator
Stand Indicator
Tripmeter Count
Tripmeter Type
Tachometer
Low Battery Indicator
Gear Indicator
Low Fuel Indicator
Clock
Service Reminder Indicator
Pillion Seat Type
Remote Key
Cruise Control
Sculpted Digital Display
RTR ENGINE
Roto Petal Disc Brakes
ABS
MUSCLED TANK
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No

Safety Features

Traction Control
ABS
Engine Kill Switch
Anti-Theft
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

Electricals

Head Light
Tail Light
Turn Signal Lamp
DRLs
AHO (Automatic Headlight On)
Hazard Warning Indicator
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

Advanced Features

Mobile Phone Connectivity
Bluetooth Connectivity
Call/SMS Alerts
GPS & Navigation
USB Charging Port
SOS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

Manufacturer Warranty

Battery Warranty
Standard Vehicle Warranty
NA
NA
NA
NA

Additonal Features

Muscled Tail Cowl
Beast-Inspired Headlamps
Muscled Engine Cowl
11-Litre Fuel Tank
Silencer Is Positioned Close To The Machine'S Overall Centre Of Gravity
Telescopic Fork The 200 Duke'S High-Quality Upside-Down Suspension
280 mm Diameter Front Disc Brakes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes

Key Features

Split Steel Trellis Frame.
Wp Apex Monoshock
13.4L Fuel Tank.
Full Led Headlamp .
Supermoto Abs.
Lcd Dash Display
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes

टीवीएस अपाचे आरटीआर 160 Comparison with Similar Bikes

केटीएम 200 ड्यूक Comparison with Similar Bikes

Popular Comparison